search
Twitter Rss Feeds
MicrosoftArticlesForumsGroups
C# .NET
VB.NET
Visual Studio .NET
ADO.NET
Xml/Xslt
VB 6.0
.NET CF
GDI+
LINQ
Deployment
Security
FoxPro
Silverlight / WPF
Entity Framework
RIA Services

Web ProgrammingArticlesForumsGroups
JavaScript
ASP
ASP.NET
Web Services

Non-MicrosoftArticlesForumsGroups
NHibernate
Perl
PHP
Ruby
Java
Linux / Unix
Apple
Open Source

DatabasesArticlesForumsGroups
SQL Server
Access
Oracle
MySQL
Other Databases

OfficeArticlesForumsGroups
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Word
Microsoft Powerpoint
Publisher
Money

Operating SystemsArticlesForumsGroups
Windows 7
Windows Server
Windows Vista
Windows XP
Windows Update
MAC
Linux / UNIX

Server PlatformsArticlesForumsGroups
Share Point
BizTalk
Site Server
Exhange Server
IIS
Transaction Server

Graphic DesignArticlesForumsGroups
Macromedia Flash
Adobe PhotoShop
Microsoft Expression

OtherArticlesForumsGroups
Subversion / CVS
Ask Dr. Dotnetsky
Active Directory
Networking
Uninstall Virus
Job Openings
Reviews
Search Engines
Resumes

 

Previous Thread:   Implementation/Migration

9/21/2005 11:06:07 AM    Correction Amount while doing Payment Journal does not make sense
An invoice is selected for payment in the Payment Journal using marking the  
  
invoice via Functions: Settlement to bring this invoice back to journal  
  
voucher form  
  
It's decided that it's going to be a partial payment and the amount is  
  
changed on the Payment Journal. A warning message will display and there is  
  
no choice but to click OK, since cancel will change the amount back to the  
  
original. The amount on the check will print for the partial amount, however,  
  
the paid amount on the remittance advice will have the full invoice amount,  
  
which is wrong.  The paid amount on the remittance advice should always match  
  
the paid amount on the check.  The work-around is to use correction amount in  
  
the Open transaction editing while marking the invoice for payment.  This  
  
however, has no functionality behind it in terms of changing the open balance  
  
on the account: whether you use correction or not, the account balance will  
  
accurately reflect the remainer.  Also this is not user friendly or  
  
intuitive. As mentioned before since there never should be a difference  
  
between the paid amount on the check and the remittance, this correction  
  
functionality should be disabled, and the amount to be paid on the payment  
  
journal should reflect on the remittance advice.  
  
For further details see incident 8320015  
  
Regards,  
  
Manny Blits  
  
----------------  
  
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the  
  
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I  
  
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this  
  
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then  
  
click "I Agree" in the message pane.  
  
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=25a5f328-5f45-47b3-b79f-83cf9b2e8da6&dg=microsoft.public.axapta.application


Pete's Blog   |    Pete's Resume   |    Robbe's Blog   |    Robbe's Resume   |    Archive #2   |    Archive #3   |    Dotnetslackers   |    XmlPitStop   |    Advertise   |   Contact Us   |   Privacy   |   Copyright (c) 2000 - 2009 eggheadcafe.com  All rights reserved.