Previous Thread:   Reg change to stop polling drives?

9/26/2005 12:48:27 PM    Re: Key went "Bye-Bye"...?
Generally when the values are not present then some default value is usually  
  
assumed by the operating system.  
  
--  
  
Regards,  
  
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.  
  
Microsoft Certified Professional  
  
Microsoft MVP [Windows]  
  
http://www.microsoft.com/protect  
  
"Kenneth" wrote:



9/26/2005 1:37:16 PM    Re: Key went "Bye-Bye"...?
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/58791.asp  
  
So 5000 is assumed when the value is not present.  
  
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/58811.asp  
  
in this case 240 seconds is assumed when the value is not present.  
  
--  
  
Regards,  
  
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.  
  
Microsoft Certified Professional  
  
Microsoft MVP [Windows]  
  
http://www.microsoft.com/protect  
  
"Kenneth" wrote:

9/26/2005 2:27:38 PM    Key went "Bye-Bye"...?
Howdy,  
  
For months, I have been plagued by an odd networking  
  
problem:  
  
If I left my laptop on, but idle, for several hours, it  
  
always lost the ability to browse. It could ping  
  
successfully, but it could not browse properly (it might be  
  
able to browse a machine or two on our 6 node LAN, but it  
  
could never browse Internet.)  
  
When this happened, the error message was that the "network  
  
name was not accessible."  
  
Of course, with that low level of specificity, this was  
  
impossible to diagnose.  
  
Until today...  
  
Today, for some reason, I got a much more useful error  
  
message:  
  
"The Name Limit for the local computer network adapter card  
  
was exceeded."  
  
With that, I quickly found MSKB Article # 319504 and felt  
  
that I was on my way to a solution.  
  
The MS recommendation was that I set the value of a  
  
particular reg key (MaxUserPort) to a particular value  
  
(65534).  
  
Easy enough, I thought, but...  
  
When I navigated to the (probably) offending key, I was  
  
surprised to find it missing.  
  
But, no matter, I thought, because the article offered an  
  
alternative modification. Instead of messing with  
  
MaxUserPort, I could modify the key TcpTimedWaitDelay that  
  
was to be found in the same location.  
  
Well, it too, was missing.  
  
So, I created the missing key for MaxUserPort, and entered  
  
the appropriate value.  
  
Now, my question:  
  
How does this sort of thing happen? That is, why might those  
  
keys not be in place at all?  
  
Sincere thanks for any thoughts,  
  
--  
  
Kenneth  
  
If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."

9/26/2005 2:57:11 PM    Re: Key went "Bye-Bye"...?
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:48:27 -0600, "Dave Patrick"  
  
<DSPatrick@nOsPAM.gmail.com> wrote:  
  
Hi Dave,  
  
To make sure that I understand your comment...  
  
You think that the possibility exists that the key(s) would  
  
not appear even with a fresh Win install?  
  
I ask because in article 319504 they don't even hint that  
  
they might not be there.  
  
Thanks again,  
  
--  
  
Kenneth  
  
If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."