search
Japanese Chinese Nederlands Espanol Italiano Deutsch Francais Twitter Rss Feeds
IIS GroupsView
Frontpage Client
Frontpage Extensions Windowsnt
Frontpage Programming
Inetserver Asp Db
Inetserver Asp General
Inetserver Iis
Inetserver Iis Security

Group SummariesView
.NET Framework
Access
BizTalk
Certifications
CRM
DDK
Exchange Server
FoxPro
French
French .NET
Games
German
German .NET
Graphic Design
IIS
Internet
ISA Server
Italian
Italian .NET
Maps
MCIS
Miscellaneous
Mobile Application Development
Money
MSN
Networking
Office
Ops Mgr
Publisher
Security
SharePoint
Small Business
Spanish
Spanish .NET
SQL Server
Systems Management Server
Transaction Server
Virtual PC / Virtual Server
Visual Studio
Win32
Windows 2000
Windows 2003 Server
Windows 7
Windows Live
Windows Media
Windows Update
Windows Vista
Windows XP
 

View All Microsoft Inetserver Iis Posts  Ask A New Question 

IIS WebServices (XML/SOAP) - grego

Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:07 AM

I am running 4x IIS6.0 Webservices servers and have been monitoring
connections on the f5 load balancer and perfmon'ing the sites. 2 used
HTTP Keep Alives and had a steady number of connections...the other 2
had keep disabled and 0 connections, although IIS logs reported the
amount of connections/requests being handled.

Now I realise that without keepalives connections are cleaned up, but
my question is whether to use Keep Alives with WebServices
anyway......they are pretty much asyncronous calls and non session
based.......posts and results, so probably no need to keep alive the
connection right??? As Keep-alives are more use with user type sites.

If you have any experience with webservices and this setting, I'd like
to know your thoughts. Is there a performance benefit of using HTTP
Keep Alives? Is there any point??
reply

Previous Microsoft Inetserver Iis conversation.