Search EggHeadCafe's Job Board
EggHeadCafe Silverlight WPF ASP.NET VB.NET C# Excel SQL Server SharePoint
search
SQL Server GroupsView
SQL Server Ce
SQL Server Clients
SQL Server Connect
SQL Server Datamining
SQL Server Datawarehouse
SQL Server Dts
SQL Server Fulltext
SQL Server Msde
SQL Server Olap
SQL Server Replication
SQL Server Reportingsvcs
SQL Server Security
SQL Server Server
SQL Server Setup
SQL Server Tools
SQL Server Clustering
SQL Server Programming
SQL Server Xml
SQL Server Newusers
SQL Server Integrationsvcs

Group SummariesView
.NET Framework
Access
BizTalk
Certifications
CRM
DDK
Exchange Server
FoxPro
French
French .NET
Games
German
German .NET
Graphic Design
IIS
Internet
ISA Server
Italian
Italian .NET
Maps
MCIS
Miscellaneous
Mobile Apps
Money
MSN
Networking
Office
Ops Mgr
Publisher
Security
SharePoint
Small Business
Spanish
Spanish .NET
SQL Server
Systems Management Server
Transaction Server
Virtual PC / Virtual Server
Visual Studio
Win32
Windows 2000
Windows 2003 Server
Windows 7
Windows Live
Windows Media
Windows Update
Windows Vista
Windows XP
 

View All Microsoft SQL Server Server Posts  Ask A New Question 

AMD vs Intel for SQL Servers

Hassan posted on Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:12 PM

I know at one time AMD used to be power players for SQL Servers, but of
late, I am hearing that Intel chips are also proving to be efficient.

Can you share what you have seen in your benchmarks on some of the new
models say in the HP space using either Intel or AMD ?

Thanks
reply

 

AMD vs Intel for SQL Servers

Bulent posted on Thursday, May 03, 2007 9:10 PM

We upgraded to AMD 64 bit dual opteron box with 4 gb memory and we
were completely happy with the results.  That was almost 2 years ago
and back then AMD sort of swept the market with price and
performance.  AMD memory access architecture for processors is far
better than performing then Intel .  So I prefer AMD x64 over Intel
EMT and has been implementing most of the sql server and desktops with
AMD x64 processors
reply

AMD vs Intel for SQL Servers

Robert Klemme posted on Friday, May 04, 2007 7:05 AM

Curious: does it really make a difference?  I would have guessed that
the capabilities of the IO subsystem are far more important for a DB
server than the CPU.

Kind regards

robert
reply

I would not discount the importance of CPUs to that degree.

LinchiShe posted on Friday, May 04, 2007 11:49 PM

I would not discount the importance of CPUs to that degree. It's true if
your workload is stressing something else, having more processor power
wouldn't help much. But in general, it pays to find out which processor works
best under what circusmstances. There are still many processing intensive
tasks. Plus, vendors are constantly trying to take advantage of the ever
increasing processor power, to trade processing for resources that may be
under stress.

Linchi
reply

AMD vs Intel for SQL Servers

Bulent posted on Saturday, May 05, 2007 9:15 AM

On May 4, 9:49 pm, Linchi Shea <LinchiS...@>

Definitely there is the IO subsystem that's very important for
database servers.  The hypertransport technology and direct memory
access that amd based systems use is also far better than Intel.
Bottom line you will get better IO performance.  Before you make your
decision check out the those and compare against intel and it's Core2
Duo systems and io, memory access methods.
reply


Previous Microsoft SQL Server Server conversation.